Hedge Fund Managers

Hedge Fund Managers

Hedge Fund Managers & Pedigree

hedge fund managersIn the hedge fund industry and for hedge fund managers is not what you know, it is not who you know. It is who knows you.

MPC Investors is a $3B hedge fund manager based in London. Last month they raised $900M to launch a pan-European directional long/short fund. This was while a higher than usual number of funds were losing assets or struggling to gain as much progress as they had during first two quarters of 2007. To launch this fund they closed two Asian-based hedge funds that had failed to reach critical mass assets under management(aum) levels and went shopping for the best hedge fund talent they could possibly fine. "I wanted to be able to look our clients in the eye and say this is exceptional," said Peter Harrison currently the Chief Executive Officer of MPC Investors. After hiring them he has also said, "you have to give your portfolio managers the best chance to outperform. That gets lost in many firms where they are trying to do a bit of management but also spending their time on strategy, or beating up their sales team, or the sales team is putting pressure on them to launch new product. Our sales team meet clients so the fund managers don't have to. Our objective is fund performance - it's all that matters."

This $900M was raised for a hedge fund manager that didn't have a track record yet and it supported a portfolio management team that did not even exist three months ago. MPC Investors didn't have the option of shopping around a three year track record and 20%+ gains since inception.

Hedge Fund Managers Attracting Investors

Hedge Fund ManagersI am writing about this because it communicates two details about how hedge fund managers are raising assets. The first is that assets are raised based more off of current relationships than past performance. The investors you are approaching must be familiar with who you are, what you stand for, and what your competitive advantage is as a hedge fund manager. The second is that pedigree and a hedge fund manager's positioning and story behind its team can trump almost any other asset gathering barrier. Harrison went out to hire the very best of the best and now he has has a structure in place that allows the portfolio management team to focus just on bringing in performance. Some would say this is a cover for bringing in great talent that's not great at speaking with investors but I think the message that portfolio managers should be focused on the market and not sales meetings resonates with many people and it is not the status quo.

If you are a large institutional investor or family office you see more hedge fund managers approaching you every quarter. How do any of the hedge fund managers stand out? I think the four ways are past relationships, pedigree of the team, competitive advantages realized through the investment process (could include manager expertise - see pedigree) and performance

I list performance last within the list above because it is really becoming a commodity for differientiating hedge fund managers. There are thousands of firms out there with great performance. It is a given that if a hedge fund manager is committing a lot of resources to marketing that they probably have great performance. With the exception of a 7 or 10 year plus track record of it, high performance alone does not excite institutional investors, they see it Monday-Friday.

Coming Soon...More Resources On Hedge Fund Managers

  • Lists of Hedge Fund Managers
  • New York Hedge Fund Managers List
  • Hedge Fund Manager Due Diligence Checklists
  • # of Hedge Fund Managers (Statistics)
  • Guide to Emerging Hedge Fund Managers
  • Top 1,000 Hedge Fund Managers
  • Guide to Selling to Hedge Fund Managers
  • Tips on Becoming a Hedge Fund Manager
  • Interviews with Hedge Fund Managers

- Richard

Permanent Link: Hedge Fund Managers

Articles Related to Hedge Fund Managers

  1. Hedge Funds
  2. CTA Database

Related Terms: Hedge Fund Managers, Hedge Funds Manager, hedge fund management, hedge fund of fund manager, hedge fund launch, hedge fund startup capital, hedge fund manager assets, hedge fund managers, hedge fund management team, hedgefund manager, hedge funds manager, hedge funds managers, manager of hedge funds

Hedge Fund Industry Networking

Hedge Fund Networking


hedge fund networkingNetworking within the hedge fund industry can be challenging, or maybe you disagree but you are constantly looking to create more powerful relationships. I want to help people connect, get answers to questions, and eventually help build a community around the Richard Wilson Hedge Fund Blog so that it is more than a long series of posts by myself.

4 Ways to Network Within the Hedge Fund Industry and Get Instant Results


1. Post comments under the blog posting that is most closely related to the type of person or group that you were looking to connect with. Everyone will instantly be able to see your contents and some people might email you directly or post a reply to your posted comment.

2. Email me at Richard@RichardCWilson.com or call me at 503.789.7901 and I will connect you with an individual I know or direct you towards a few possible next steps.

3. Write a guest article for the Richard Wilson Hedge Fund Blog. I currently have around 250 people reading my blog every day which is getting close to 100,000 visits/year. Write anywhere from two paragraphs to ten pages and if it seems to be in line with the topics I'm focusing on I will post it with a two sentence spot on who you are with your email address at the bottom of it.

4.

hedge fund group on linked.comThe Hedge Funds Group has been launched in conjunction with Linkedin.com. This group was formed in an effort to further connect hedge fund professionals to share business leads, provide consulting services, network, and share online resources related to the hedge fund industry.

Initially attracting mainly technology/IT professionals the site now boasts over 100,000 CEOs as members along with tens of thousands of investment and hedge fund professionals. Linkedin.com has over 5 million members and is growing quicker than Myspace and FaceBook. Below are some stats on the growth of Linkedin.com compared to other social networking websites that you might be familiar with:

NetworkGrowth rate
LinkedIn189%
Club Penguin157%
Facebook125%
Windows Live Spaces32%
MySpace19%

Source: Nielsen Online

I have created a new group for hedge fund professionals who are on Linkedin.com. To join this network of hedge fund professionals and casual industry followers please click on the link below:

Linkedin.com Hedge Funds Group Invitation Link

- Richard

Permanent Link: Hedge Fund Industry Networking

Articles Related to Hedge Fund Industry Networking
  1. Hedge fund
  2. Hedge Funds
  3. Hedge Fund Managers
  4. Hedge Fund Jobs
  5. Hedge Fund Research
  6. Hedge Fund Strategy
  7. Hedge Fund Marketing
  8. Hedge Fund Due Diligence
  9. Hedge Fund Terms
  10. Hedge Fund Book
Subscribe To this Blog via RSS Or By Email

Related Terms: hedge fund networking, hedge fund network, hedge fund industry, hedge fund industry networking, hedge fund online networking, hedge fund community, hedge fund of fund community, fund of fund networking, network within the hedge fund industry, hedge funds networking

Online Hedge Fund Communities

Online Hedge Fund Communities & Message Boards

Online hedge fund communities and message boards can be the quickest way to learn about hedge funds. You can quickly read common questions that new investors or hedge fund industry professionals are asking and directly connect with experienced people in the field who are happy to talk to you about hedge funds.

The Top Five Online Hedge Fund Communities (in addition to HedgeFundBlogger.com of course) are:

  1. Hedge Fund Message Board.com
  2. Albourne Village
  3. Hedge Fund Marketing Alliance Message board
  4. Hedge Fund Lounge
  5. The Hedge Fund Center

Let me know if you frequently visit another online hedge fund community that is not listed above and I'll work on expanding this list to the Top Ten Online Hedge Fund Communities & Message Boards.

Here are some other websites that I am now building up over the next two years.

- Richard

Articles Related to Online Hedge Fund Communities

  1. Hedge fund
  2. Hedge Funds
  3. Hedge Fund Managers
  4. Hedge Fund Jobs
  5. Hedge Fund Research
  6. Hedge Fund Strategy
  7. Hedge Fund Marketing
  8. Hedge Fund Due Diligence
  9. Hedge Fund Terms
Permanent link: Online Hedge Fund Communities & Message Boards
Related Terms: Hedge fund community, hedge fund communities, hedge fund forum, hedge fund message board, hedge fund of fund forum, hedge fund of fund message board, hedge funds forum, hedge funds message board, hedge funds community.

Jobs at Hedge Funds

Jobs at Hedge Funds

Information on Jobs at Hedge Funds

Jobs at Hedge FundsJobs at hedge funds can sometimes be hard to obtain. I had several people write in over the weekend asking for advice on landing jobs at different types of hedge funds, so here it is.

The following are the three steps I would recommend someone take if they are currently working outside of the industry or are currently going to school full time.

1. Learn everything you can about hedge funds, trends, who the big players area, etc. Subscribe to my blog (yes it is free), join the Albourne Village (online hedge fund community), read white papers and hedge fund news through Google, and read articles found on Hedge World.

2. Get some sort of 1-10 hour a week hedge fund internship or experience of some type just so you can get the clock ticking on that and show actual involvement with a group in the industry. I know you are probably working full time already and maybe even going to school too but getting immersed in the work ASAP is important.

3. Start having coffee or cold calling a couple dozen professionals in the industry to establish relationships that could lead to referrals to hiring hedge funds. Yes, it takes hard work and you will be putting yourself out there. This process of doing informational interviews might save you a few years of working in the wrong position or mistakenly entering the industry with large misconceptions. Informational interviews have helped me land every single position I have ever held.

Jobs at Hedge Funds - Additional Resources

My recent post on Hedge Fund Jobs discusses the specifics of what hedge funds look for in people and on resumes.

I have recently found an individual willing to help improve your hedge fund or investment resume. If you would like 1-4 hours of resume editing, coaching and career guidance please send me an email at Richard@HedgeFundGroup.org.


- Richard

Permanent Link: Jobs at Hedge Funds

Articles Related to Jobs at Hedge Funds:

Related Terms: jobs at hedge funds, hedge fund job, hedge fund jobs, hedge funds jobs, jobs in hedge funds, entry level hedge fund jobs, hedge funds job, hedge fund trading jobs, hedge fund jobs in new york, hedge fund jobs in chicago, hedge fund jobs in boston, hedge fund marketing jobs, how to get a job at a hedge fund, hedge fund analyst job, hedge fund compliance jobs, hedge fund sales jobs, hedge fund trader job, hedge fund jobs ct, hedge fund manager job, job at hedge fund, hedge fund manager jobs, hedge fund jobs entry, hedge fund vanancies, hedge fund employment, hedge fund positions

Hedge Fund Seed Capital

Hedge Fund Seed Capital


hedge fund seed capital, hedge fund capital
Hedge Fund Capital Guide Part 1
Hedge Fund Seed capital is the money a hedge fund tries to raise to launch or within it's first year of operating to try to "get it off the ground" and hopefully raise enough assets to appear respectable to initial investors and provide initial momentum towards breaking even as a business. Hedge fund seed capital is in high demand, there are literally hundreds of investment groups looking for it right now and only three or four handfuls will receive any significant amount of it. Some hedge funds are seeded with as little as $500,00 while others receive up to $350M. From my experience I would guess that 70% of first year hedge fund seed capital levels range from $3M to $25M.

Hedge Fund Seed Capital Sources

  • Hedge Fund Seed Capital Source #1: High Net Worth individuals (accredited investors) who are familiar with your trading skills, past portfolio management experience, or clearly understand your competitive advantage in the marketplace.
  • Hedge Fund Seed Capital Source #2: Family & Friends who are accredited investors.
  • Hedge Fund Seed Capital Source #3: Private Equity Firms. Many private equity funds have jumped into the space of seeding hedge funds and many will in turn work on raising assets for your fund once it will benefit both your fund and themselves.
  • Hedge Fund Seed Capital Source #3: Hedge Funds. Some hedge funds have huge amounts of free cash flow and are looking for ways to re-invest it within strategies they understand and do not directly compete with products that they plan to create on their own.
  • Hedge Fund Seed Capital Source #4: Associated banks or investment networks will often seed new hedge fund products they are launching with significant levels of capital.
    Hedge Fund Seed Capital-Related Trends
If you read hedge fund news every day you will notice several trends emerging in the area of hedge fund seed capital. The most prominent is as mentioned above many private equity firms are agressively placin seed capital with emerging hedge fund managers. The second is that most of hedge fund seed capital is coming from established hedge funds and private equity groups or investment banks. I believe that the banks are succeeding in convincing a small fund to give up 20-40% of equity in return for the funds because they also come with marketing and distribution resources that will make the total pie of available fees much higher. Many hedge fund managers have become millionaires after accepting outside seed money or an equity investment.



Interested in hedge fund marketing? Read dozens of more hedge fund marketing & sales articles along with details on third party marketing within the Hedge Fund Marketing Guide.

Articles Related to "Hedge Fund Seed Capital"

  1. Preqin Hedge Fund Investor Databases
  2. Hedge Fund Consultant
  3. Seed Capital
  4. Hedge Funds & Media Exposure
  5. Hedge Funds
  6. Marketing Hedge Funds
  7. Hedge Fund Marketing
  8. Family Office Hedge Fund
  9. Hedge Fund Research
  10. Hedge Fund Seeding
  11. Capital Introduction
Subscribe To this Blog via RSS Or By Email

Permanent Link: Hedge Fund Capital
Related Terms: hedge fund seed capital, hedge fund of fund seed capital, hedge funds seed capital, fund of fund seed capital, hedge fund seed capital sources, hedge fund capital, hedgefund capital, hedge funds capital, hedge fund of fund capital sources

Chinese Hedge Funds

Chinese Hedge Funds



Some groups have estimated that China's middle class will be larger than the total population of the United States by 2010. I think that over the next 5-7 years there will be an explosion of capital out of China investing in US hedge funds and in turn an even stronger showing of Chinese hedge funds.

China Hedge Fund Industry Trend


As their capital markets become stronger and more mature the average person in China is saving 15% more of what they earn every year. Equities have been on a rally increasing almost 75% so far in 2007 but eventually the market will be mature enough and equities growth outlook choppy enough that diversification into alternative assets will become more important. If you are a hedge fund there may be opportunities to sell and market your products through Chinese-based but American owned banks or financial networks. The WSJ reports that in 2006 there were over 60 hedge funds currently investing in China and according to Eurekahedge this makes up over $4B in assets.

Chinese Hedge Funds Resources:

The US-China Business Council has more information on statistics related to Chinese hedge funds and investors in China.

Articles Related to Chinese Hedge Funds
  1. China Hedge Funds - Guide to Hedge Funds in China
  2. Geographical Hedge Fund Guides
  3. London Hedge Fund Guide
  4. Chicago Hedge Fund Guide
  5. Boston Hedge Fund Guide
  6. European Hedge Fund Guide
  7. Singapore Hedge Fund guide
  8. Dubai Hedge Fund Guide
  9. Hong Kong Hedge Fund Guide
  10. China Hedge Fund Guide
  11. Australian Hedge Fund Guide
  12. Japan Hedge Fund Guide
  13. Brazil Hedge Fund Guide
- Richard

Permanent Link to this Post: Chinese Hedge Funds

Related Terms: Chinese Hedge Funds, Chinese Hedge Fund, China Hedge Fund, China Hedge Funds, Chinese Hedge Fund of Funds, Chinese Hedge Funds of Funds, China hedge fund of fund, china hedge funds of funds

Australian Superannuation Funds | Allocations to Hedge Fund Managers

Superannuation Funds

LonAustralian Superannuation Funds


Quick Link: Australian Hedge Fund Guide

The assets of Australian Super funds total around $1 trillion and, despite the value of hedge funds in portfolio construction, have less than 3% invested in this asset class.

The University of NSW and the Australian chapter of AIMA conducted a survey in Jan 2006 aimed at examining the attitude of Super funds to hedge fund investing. The respondents to the survey carried funds under management of more than A$145 billion.

The key findings of the study were:
  • current allocation of under 3% is expected to rise to over 4% over the next 2-5 years
  • the current focus on global strategies is expected to remain - surprisingly only 14% were Australian-based strategies
  • funds of funds represented 49% of investments, although this is expected to decline in favour of individual funds and multi strategy funds in future
  • the most popular strategy is long/short equity
  • operational and governance issues were most important to those considering investment
By Rick Steele

Related to Australian Superannuation Funds | Allocations to Hedge Fund Managers:

Tags: Australian Superannuation Funds | Allocations to Hedge Fund Managers, Superannuation Funds, Super Annuation Funds, Australia Superannuation Fund, allocations

ASIC Study on Hedge Funds | Scrutiny

ASIC Study

ASIC Studied Hedge Funds


Quick Link: Australian Hedge Funds

Australia's financial services regulator, ASIC, is researching hedge funds in Australia to better understand the potential risks to investors. The study, based on publically available information, will not be published and will be used for internal purposes only.

In Australia, hedge funds may be offered to retail investors under a registered Product Disclosure Statement. Around half the A$20 billion Australian hedge fund industry is made up of registered funds.

A key observation of the study is that the funds offered are more benign then ASIC had expected in a number of respects; gearing, fees and profitability.

Also, there does not appear to be any disruptive influence by foreign-operated hedge funds on the efficient and proper functioning of Australian markets.

As with all funds offered to Australian investors, ASIC is concerned that product documentation needs to be "clear, concise and effective". Hedge funds are not likely to be singled out in particular compared with other retail/mutual funds.

By Rick Steele

Related to:

Tags: ASIC Company, ASIC Names, ASIC Register, ACIS News, ASIC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9, ASIC online, ASIC program, ASIC Hedge Funds, ASIC Hedge Fund, ASIC Hedge Fund Industry

Australia as Head of the Hedge Fund Industry? A Reality?

Top Hedge Fund City

Australia as Head of the Hedge Fund Industry?


Quick Link: Australian Hedge Fund Guide

Australia has a growing hedge fund industry, but the main hedge fund centers remain London and New York. While Australia has the largest amount of hedge funds under management in the region (recently estimated at $40 billion), a respected regulatory regime and high quality people, it is Hong Kong, Singapore and possibly Tokyo that are vying for hedge fund leadership in Asia.

What would it take to set Sydney on a path of hedge fund leadership in the region?

The key stumbling block is tax, in particular withholding tax. While other jurisdictions have strong records in providing hedge fund services the main advantage they carry over Australia is tax. A number of centers, such as the Cayman Islands, Bermuda and British Virgin Islands have established a strong position in servicing hedge funds by offering a tax-free environment for investors and managers. Other developed markets such as the UK, Ireland, Luxembourg, Hong Kong, and Singapore do not impose withholding tax and market this as a key selling point in attracting foreign direct investment.

So what is the logic of withholding tax? Withholding taxes such as PAYE in Australia are designed to limit avoidance and evasion by taxing at the source of income. Withholding tax on non-residents however does not carry the same logic, except to reduce the opportunity for residents to configure their arrangements to appear to be non-residents and avoid domestic taxation. Applying withholding tax on non-residents is a case of cutting off our nose to spite our face; it may be effective in reducing avoidance activities of residents, but it is also effective in turning away genuine non-residents and spurning the development of an Australian hedge fund industry.

Withholding tax has the effect of securing taxation revenue from a small domestic hedge fund industry, but prospective taxation revenue on a new regional or global industry is foregone. Let me explain.

Currently, overseas investors in Australian hedge funds (and investments generally) are subject to withholding tax. While withholding tax is also applied in many countries that might compete with Australia for investors, there are other well-established jurisdictions that do not impose withholding tax and are thus in an advantaged position to offer hedge fund products.

Thus, to meet overseas demand for Australian hedge funds, Australian managers generally develop and offer hedge fund products by way of an offshore-based fund company registered in such jurisdictions as the Cayman Islands. Generally, investment management is conducted by an Australian investment manager team either directly or by way of an advisory agreement with the fund company, although in some cases fund managers are incentivised to set up their entire businesses overseas. In any case, the related services of custody, prime broking, administration, legal, accounting and audit are generally delivered by overseas-appointed providers.

For offshore structured Australian hedge funds, the Australian government does participate in the taxation revenue associated with a fund's earnings remitted to Australian participants. However, there is a substantial leakage of revenue from the absence of withholding tax (because the funds are not located in Australia) and both individual and corporate taxation proceeds from Australian service providers that are NOT being used by the overseas fund company. The Australian government will earn withholding tax on those investors who do choose to invest in Australian products despite the disadvantages of doing so. Withholding tax thus has the unintended impact of shackling jobs growth and lowering potential taxation revenue.

To be a centre for hedge funds, Australia needs to attract all the ancillary hedge fund service providers and to provide an environment that would encourage both Australian and overseas fund managers to set up in Australia rather the current situation of encouraging Australian fund managers to set up overseas. Hedge fund managers are not constrained to investing in domestic assets and so the domicile of a hedge fund business will be driven by factors such as tax, people and regulator.

The BOLD decision would thus be to remove withholding tax on all non-resident financial asset investments in Australia based on the expectation that the withholding tax forgone will be more than outweighed by higher corporate and individual taxation associated with increased exports of financial services and greater jobs growth and of course the collection cost of the withholding tax. Modeling this analysis would be a very worthy exercise.

The application of withholding tax is particularly inappropriate in the case of funds offered to overseas investors that invest primarily in overseas assets in what the authorities term "non-Australian things".

Thus, a SECOND BEST solution is to acknowledge that the current policy to tax Australian-sourced income regardless of residence of the investor will not change. In this event, we should accept that Australia will NEVER be a regional funds management centre and instead look to particular areas where Australia can grow the hedge fund industry on the margin to the mutual benefit of government and industry.

Australian fund managers investing in “Australian things” will continue to require an offshore structured fund company for overseas investors, and if warranted by demand from Australian investors a second fund with Australian service providers as Australian investors are limited by FIF in their investments in offshore fund companies. While this twin structure is costly and inefficient, it is the only practical way to proceed in these circumstances.

However, where a fund’s investors are exclusively non-resident and activities are principally related to “non-Australian things” these non-residents investors should be exempt from a withholding tax to allow Australian fund managers to compete globally.

For clarity, the fund should not be denominated in Australian dollars, Australian FIF rules should not apply, foreign exchange contracts would be permissible provided they were in respect of overseas assets and management fees would be taxable at the company tax rate.

To tackle the additional risk of avoidance by residents, the exemption could be set to only apply to those non-residents of tax treaty countries including on a “look through” to the ultimate holder of a trust.

Australian non-resident withholding tax is a material impediment to potential growth of the hedge fund (and financial services) industry in Australia. In view of the other advantages Australia carries in financial services, exempting non-residents from withholding tax (with some reasonable caveats) would take Australia to a position of regional leadership in hedge funds.

By Rick Steele

Related to Australia as Head of the Hedge Fund Industry? A Reality?:

Tags: Australia as Head of the Hedge Fund Industry, top hedge fund cities, hedge fund city, top hedge fund city, what is the top hedge fund city, top hedge fund cities, Melbourne Sydney

Hedge Funds on Stock Exchanges | Listed Funds in Australia

Listed Hedge Funds

Hedge Funds on Stock Exchanges


Quick Link: Geographical Hedge Fund Guides

There is a vibrant Listed Investment Company community on the Australian Stock Exchange that includes companies managing Australian equities, overseas equities and other specialist funds. Is there a value in listing hedge funds as an alternative to offering hedge funds as retail managed funds?

In other markets, such as Ireland and Singapore, listing is offered as an alternative "structure of convenience" to allow investors to participate that might otherwise be constrained by an unlisted vehicle or the jurisdiction of the particular fund company, particularly if it is located in a non-tax treaty country such as the Cayman Islands.

What happens in practice in these situations is little different from the unlisted model. Applications and redemptions occur at the posted price for the day rather than a market price struck by the meeting of buyers and sellers as is generally the case in listed markets. As a result, there are net applications and redemptions on a day that are managed by the fund administrator. Prices are published by the exchange, but little additional investor comfort is gained from the listing.

It is possible to list a Cayman fund for example on the Irish Stock Exchange (ISE). This can be done with little additional documentation than required to establish the fund registered with the Cayman Monetary Authority. If the fund has already commenced, trading an Audited Statement of Net Assets will be required at the time of listing, otherwise no accompanying financials are required. Once the fund is listed, the day-to-day operation of the fund is usually the responsibility of the Administrator. This will include the calculation of Rel=”nofollow” target=”_blank” the net asset value and processing the subscription and redemption applications.

Because it is not possible to subscribe or redeem shares at any other price other than the net asset value, there is no opportunity for investors to exploit pricing differences ie there is no secondary market for investment funds on the ISE, so a listed fund on the ISE is not actively traded.

The listing of an investment fund on such exchanges as the ISE or Singapore Stock Exchange are simply a "technical listings"; marketing tools to assist a fund access a wider investor base. For example, it is useful where a fund seeks to target institutional investors. A listing can facilitate distribution because some such investors are often prohibited from investing in unlisted securities.

By Rick Steele

Related to Hedge Funds on Stock Exchanges | Listed Funds in Australia:

Tags: Hedge Funds on Stock Exchanges | Listed Funds in Australia, Stock Exchanges, Hedge Funds listed on stock exchanges, listed hedge fund managers, listed hedge funds, hedge funds which are listed

ASIC on Hedge Funds | Hedge Fund Industry

ASIC on Hedge Funds

ASIC & Hedge Fund Managers


Pointedly for the fledgling Australian hedge fund industry, incoming Governor of the Reserve Bank of Australia, Glen Stevens has issued a strong warning that hedge funds pose a risk to financial stability which is difficult for regulators to deal with. Mr Stevens was speaking at an event organised by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority and the Hong Kong Association of Banks on 15 September 2006.

According to the ABC, Mr Stevens said that the increased use of debt and the growing complexity of investments could disrupt markets when harder times came, as they surely would. He said it would be under abnormal conditions, when liquidity in markets was under pressure, that difficulties could arise. This post reviews Mr Steven's speech and seeks to identify areas that participants in the hedge fund industry in Australia should be aware of.

In particular, Mr Stevens referred to hedge funds as being "lightly regulated and often highly leveraged." While this might be the case globally, it is less true in Australia where investment managers are licensed under ASIC supervision and disclosure for retail funds at least is required by ASIC to be included in Product Disclosure Statements (PDSs). Admittedly an absence of industry wide data makes it hard to assess, but anecdotely hedge fund products in Australia are generally not highly leveraged.

Hedge funds' record of rapid growth and high reported returns has attracted a lot of attention by investors, Mr Stevens said. Ten years ago hedge funds were regarded as an exotic asset class, but now they are increasingly seen as part of the main stream for pension funds, university endowments and the like. Financial institutions are also increasingly in the habit of establishing in-house vehicles to tap the appetite for hedge-fund-type investments on the part of investors. Mr Stevens is right that awareness of hedge funds has increased dramatically in Australia in recent years, and while holdings of such funds have increased, they still represent a small weight in institutional and retail portfolios. In another post on this blog on 17 August 2006 titled Australian Superannuation Funds Use of Hedge Funds, a survey by the University of NSW and the Australian chapter of AIMA showed that current allocation to hedge funds by Australian superannuation funds of under 3% is expected to rise to over 4% over the next 2-5 years. Similar data for retail has not been compiled, but is likely to be similar.

According to Mr Stevens, the very term 'hedge fund' seems to be used rather more loosely than it used to be: he says we are really talking about any investment vehicle which is willing and able to take advantage of the vast array of financial products, 24-hour trading and ample liquidity to expose the funds of sophisticated investors to virtually any conceivable type of risk. The range of risks and lack of correlation with traditional equity and bond asset classes of course is one of the real attractions of hedge funds.

In Australia, hedge funds are not necessarily lightly regulated; they are treated by the regulator in much the same way as other managed investment vehicles. Around half of Australian hedge funds are retail managed funds that are carried in a PDS and registered with ASIC. Many of the wholesale and overseas investor funds/mandates have strategies that mirror the Australian retail offerings and Australian-based managers operate with an Australian Financial Services Licence.

Mr Stevens observed that by exploiting (and thereby eliminating) pricing anomalies and by being less encumbered by prudential controls than most other financial institutions, hedge funds promote efficiency in the allocation of capital by searching out returns more effectively than others. On the assumption, moreover, that those who put money into hedge funds know what risks they are taking - which might, increasingly, be a big assumption - people might take the view that what investors do with their money is their own business. Rather than being less encumbered by prudential controls imposed by the law, hedge funds are less encumbered by the mandate they have been given by investors and their advisers. The well-intentioned limits that have grown up around more traditionally managed monies have come at cost in terms of flexibility and ultimately return. The shift to hedge funds is a practical acknowledgment that straight-jacketing an investment manager will curb investment returns, and may even increase risk if the limits include limits on the use of hedging.

Critics, on the other hand says Stevens, claim that hedge funds can overwhelm and distort small markets; a tendency for herd behavior, and application of leverage, amplifies the problem. When hedge funds decide simultaneously to get into or out of a position, they can disrupt market functioning. The entities in question are essentially those financial investment vehicles which are outside the normal pridential regulatory net. The situation that Mr Stevens describes threatens market integrity and is something that the RBA should be very sensitive to and monitor closely. However, it would be useful to know just how many entities are outside the "prudential net" as Mr Stevens put it. Is this a risk presented more by overseas funds that might be larger, better coordinated and more lightly regulated? The failed attempt by the SEC to require hedge fund registration may have been a setback in this respect. Ideally, a system that required registration in each major jurisdiction that was recognized in other jurisdictions with comparable regulation would be most effective.

In Australia, the rapid growth of AIMA's membership suggests a willingness of managers to understand the particular requirements of the Australian jurisdiction as AIMA has a strong regulatory and compliance element, including membership by leading legal and accounting firms in the hedge funds industry.

Mr Stevens highlighted two issues that regulators need to address:
  • Ensuring there is sufficient disclosure to allow investors to make informed judgments about the risks and returns. In Australia, the regulatory authorities draw no distinction between hedge funds and other investment managers; the regulatory regime is determined by what the entity does, rather than what it is called. This ensures a level playing field.
  • Ensuring that the activities of investment managers which are not subject to prudential supervision do not threaten the financial viability of firms, such as banks, that are. This approach emphasizes to the counter parties of hedge funds and other highly leveraged institutions (such as prime brokers, banks and investment houses) the importance of strong risk management, collateral, knowing their customer and so on. The aim here is to preserve the prudential strength of the core part of the system in the interests of economic financial stability, while allowing the part beyond the prudential net to play its role in taking on risk.
In Australia, given the role of ASIC in supervising the managed funds industry, including hedge funds, it is the second point that is most relevant. Mr Stevens notes that it is difficult, because of the complexity of the strategies adopted for counterparties to really understand the risks they are exposed to. Prime brokers take this risk management very seriously, not least of all because in extreme situations their own capital is potentially at risk. The credit departments of prime brokers play an active role in assessing investment strategies at the outset and ongoing and setting limits that seek to manage this risk. In most cases prime brokers also act as custodian of the assets of the fund, which gives them timely access to portfolio data and the ability to enforce the limits they set on each manager's fund.

Mr Stevens is skeptical of the argument that hedge funds necessarily add to liquidity. Under conditions of pressure, Mr Stevens argues that leveraged investors are more likely to need to use the liquidity of the market than to be able to contribute to it. On such occasions - which is when liquidity is needed most - these funds surely are liquidity takers, not providers he says. This argument, however, doesn't acknowledge one of the real benefits that hedge funds bring to markets - the use of short selling - which provides a natural offset to leveraged investments. This allows both buyers and sellers to express their view no matter what their current holding in a security.

Mr Stevens also suggests that hedge funds might command undue market power because of the brokerage they generate for investment banks. It is brave to suggest that listed markets can be manipulated in this way without risk of loss. In any case, such opportunities would be limited to particular hedge fund strategies and asssumes that for a particular transaction, market forces can somehow be subverted by these financial institutions in favor of hedge funds. This is a risk, but frankly in a properly functioning market unlikely to occur.

In summary, much of the risks that have been put forward by Mr Stevens could be assessed by simply taking a closer look at the participants in Australia and the strategies they are adopting. In view of the fact that Mr Stevens is the incoming Governor of the RBA his comments deserve to be addressed. As half of the hedge funds in Australia are retail managed funds, their strategies are outlined in PDSs which are registered with ASIC. Public information could be supplemented by surveys that determine how many strategies involve leverage and what amount of leverage is used.

By Rick Steele

Related to ASIC on Hedge Funds | Hedge Fund Industry:

Tags: ASIC, ASIC On hedge funds, ASIC Hedge Fund, ASIC Hedge Fund Regulations, ASIC Regulations, ASIC Hedge Funds, ASIC project world tool verification history laws rules

Amaranth Hedge Fund Lessons | What could be learned?

Amaranth Lessons

Amaranth Hedge Fund Lessons


In an earlier post on this site, I highlighted Reserve Bank of Australia Governor Glen Steven's concerns about hedge fund failure and the adverse impact such failure may have on Australia's financial system. In the same week that Mr Stevens delivered his speech in Hong Hong, prominent US hedge fund manager Amaranth Advisors was facing a major setback in its US$9. 2billion fund, losing US$6 billion on a natural gas investment strategy.

Amaranth manage a multi-strategy fund that delivered strong returns over recent years. There website described their approach as following a "broad spectrum of alternative investment and trading strategies in a highly disciplined, risk-controlled manner." However, according to the New York Times on 23 Sep 2006, a significant part of recent returns had been driven by trading-related profits from energy and commodities; contributions of US$1.26 billion in 2005 and US$2.17 billion Jan to Aug 2006. There was clue to the risk adopted in the fund with a 10% decline in May offset by high returns in April and June.

Apparently, the Fund held a position that would benefit if the spread between the March and April 2007 natural gas contracts rose. In the event they declined, and presumably because the positions were leveraged, the fund then had to meet substantial margin calls and/or close the positions in loss. In the end, the energy book was closed on 20 Sep and the fund realised a US$6 billion loss and a decline of 65% for the month and 55% calendar year to date.

One of the factors contributing to this outcome was liquidity in this commodity market. This was one of the risks raised by Mr Stevens. He said that just when liquidity is needed most, at a point of crisis, it is not available. This might spell trouble for the hedge fund, but what concerned Mr Stevens was the risk of destabilising the financial system as a whole, as was the case with the failure of Long-Term Capital Management in 1998. Surprisingly, given the size of the losses recorded at Amaranth there has been little flow-on impact observed so far. Its early days in this apparent failure, but this is encouraging.

Are there any lessons for Australia? The surprise is that this occurred in a so-called multi-strategy fund where an investor might expect a diversified set of strategies to drive returns. The fund had disclosed that energy had contributed 78% of year to June results of 20%+, suggesting limited diversification. The size of these gains and the subsequent losses are presumably the result of leverage. If the natural gas strategy was within the mandate for the Fund, and rational investors were aware of this mandate, they could have acted to ensure their own portfolios were suitably diversified and could cope with failure in any one position.

A knee-jerk response would be say that investing in hedge funds is risky and should be limited or prohibited. A more considered response would be to ensure that investment strategies/mandates, including leverage, are clearly set out in ASIC-registered Product Disclosure Statements. Armed with this information indivual investors and their advisers would then be in a position to make appropriate portfolio structuring decisions, that will protect investors from individual investment failure.

By Rick Steele

Related to Amaranth Hedge Fund Lessons | What could be learned?:

Tags: Amaranth Hedge Fund Lessons | What could be learned, amaranth hedge fund lessons to be learned, what can be learned from Amaranth, what can be learned from failed hedge funds

RBA Article on Hedge Funds | Notes

RBA Article

RBA Article on Hedge Funds


The RBA's David Jacobs and Susan Black published an article in the November 2006 RBA Bulletin that provides a good assessment of the current status of the Australian hedge fund industry. This article follows comments by the Governor (see Reserve Bank of Australia's Stevens Flags Australian Hedge Funds Risk). The article was picked up in a story by Fiona Buffini of the Australian Financial Review on 17 November 2006 in which she highlighted the surge of retail investment in hedge funds as being of concern to the RBA.

Buffini's article is headed "RBA Warns on Hedge Funds", but in fact the Jacobs & Black article identifies some real positives for the industry in Australia. Most importantly, the Australian regulatory regime makes no distinction between hedge funds and other managed funds; the same registration, operational and disclosure requirements apply to a fund regardless of whether it is a hedge fund or not. This is a great positive for the hedge funds industry and the financial services industry generally. There is no logic whatsoever in seeking to make special rules for hedge funds given the lack of clarity in what actually defines such a fund and the importance of all investments being treated on a comparable basis so investors can make proper assessments of risk and return. One of the reasons for the public concern about hedge funds in the US is that hedge funds aren't required to be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and that as a result transparency is limited.

Also highlighted in the Jacobs & Black article was the growing importance of the hedge fund industry as an exporter of financial services, even though Australian managers have generally not been adopted by Australian institutional investors (see also Australia as a Centre for Hedge Funds?)

Finally, the article notes the powerful diversifying features of hedge funds that are the result of their lack of correlation with sharemarkets and other traditional asset classes eg over the past five years the Australian hedge fund industry has delivered a return in line with local sharemarkets - 12% - but with half the standard deviation, a generally accepted measure of risk. For Australian investors with high weights to Australian shares and property that have performed well in the last several years, investing in assets that are not correlated with Australian shares and property is likely to be VERY important for portfolio diversification.

Jacobs & Black offer hints of concerns about fees and about transparency, but both factors face considerable commercial pressure, particularly among institutional investors. The article also raises the spectre of leverage that is generally adopted by hedge funds (and private equity) and the potential systemic risk this brings to bear on the Australian financial system. This is a matter that does fall directly at the doorstep of the Bank and requires monitoring. However, current investments in hedge funds are currently very low in the total of Australian savings, and though these funds employ leverage, this is not yet a matter that should be of concern.

It would be helpful for policy makers and market participants to have better data on the amount of leverage employed by hedge funds. There are a number of data providers who are developing better information on Australian funds. The LCA Group which was referenced in the Jacobs & Black article have a quarterly publication with news stories and performance tables and Investment & Technology is working on performance reporting. Aggregate leverage and exposure data, as well as other directory information, is expected to be provided by a new industry survey to be published shortly. Leverage information on overseas funds invested in by Australians may be more difficult to determine, particularly given the limited information made available by fund of funds and the weaker requirements for transparency in other jurisdictions.

One important matter omitted from the Jacob & Black article was reference to the amount of retail hedge funds that carry capital guarantees where the risk of capital loss has been limited. In Australia, a large share of Australian retail investor hedge funds offer investments guaranteed at maturity. In these cases, the floor on returns makes them less risky than many naked sharemarket funds and property.

The Jacobs & Black article notes that the proportion of investments by retail investors in Australia is higher than in the US. This is partly the result of the slower uptake by institutional investors in Australia and partly that US hedge fund managers are limited by regulation to offering their products to accredited investors, such as those that have net worth in excess of US$1 million. In an environment where hedge fund managers were licensed, as they are in Australia, and investors are provided with suitable information about the fund and the manager responsible, then naturally one would expect a higher take-up by retail investors. The proportion of investors participating in hedge funds could be reduced in Australia by simply prohibiting such investments and limiting choice, but this is unlikely to be beneficial from a portfolio risk management perspective. In view of the volatility (risk) data provided by the authors removing an asset class with low correlation to traditional asset classes would likely raise the exposure of retail investors to the inevitable correction in share and property markets.

The comment that hedge funds are difficult to assess because they depend on manager skill is a glib one. Broad asset class returns are also difficult to predict, and as noted above, can exhibit far greater volatility (risk) than hedge funds. Buffini quotes financial adviser Rick Capel of Capel & Associates who noted that hedge funds have not been tested in a wholesale market meltdown (decline). The question for investors of course is whether they would be better served by being exposed to sharemarkets or hedge funds in a market meltdown. As Jacobs & Black pointed out, more than half of Australia's hedge funds (and this would be indicative globally) are long/short equity funds including market neutral; these are just the funds that would be expected to perform best in such an environment.

Nevertheless, a market meltdown would impact those hedge funds that carry a long bias to sharemarkets. Just as market returns have contributed to the return of such funds a market decline, unless the fund was particularly nimble, would detract from hedge fund returns and may even contribute to losses. Again, survey data on aggegrate fund market exposure and leverage would help determine whether there was significant market risk in hedge fund portfolios.

In fact it could be argued that the real risk for retail investors is not the complexity and risks associated with hedge funds, but the more traditional risk of constructing investment portfolios based on recent historical returns. Presently, Australian retail investors risk being seduced into raising and even leveraging Australian share exposure, following a period of strong returns over the past three years, and not taking the opportunity to introduce risk-reducing investments such as hedge funds.

With hedge funds, like any investment, investors need to diversify their approach. This appears to have been the case with high profile Amaranth (See Amaranth Losses - Lessons for Australia). Although the fund did lose substantial sums of investors' money, individual investors appear to have been well diversified and generally had other investments against which this loss could be matched.

In summary, the Jacobs & Black article is a good account of the current state of the Australian hedge fund industry. It highlights some important postives for this young and growing industry. Care should be taken not to tar the Australian hedge fund industry with the same brush as overseas funds where there have been a number of high profile collapses and concerns about transparency that can in part be attributed to the unregulated nature of hedge funds. In contrast, Australian hedge funds have the benefit of a regulator that requires the same degree of operational and disclosure requirements as other funds offered to Australian investors. And impending new data on the Australian hedge fund industry should help defray concerns that are simply not warranted at this stage of the industry's development.

By Rick Steele

Related to RBA Article on Hedge Funds | Notes:

Tags: RBA Article on Hedge Funds | Notes, hedge fund articles, hedge funds articles, articles on hedge funds, posts on hedge funds, hedge funds news stories, analysis

Hedge Fund Videos | 30+ Free Videos on Hedge Funds